Monat: November 2016

Something that explains ‚everything‘.

In a structural(istic) perspectivs one can interprete that something that explains everything explains nothing. Because it has no contrast.

That’s a perspective. And in another, not relativistic or structuralistic perspective, one can also assume that there could theoretical-practically be someting that explains everything. Because as a theoretical whole of every single and absolute and whatever-form-of existing things, when they’re all explained in every possible way and angle etc. Then there would be everything explained. Infinity captured, for example. [In my opinion Georg Cantor is a transcender sender/subjectcomposition-aspectually expressing interesting things.]

We can call this state or reference „Hologram“, „God“ or „Heaven“ etc. Or Fredric Jameson*. 😉

*And his theoretical way of writing about critical totalisations to engage other totalisations.




Ein Hobby, in „britischem“ Sinne

Etwas, das man sich nicht ausgesucht hat. Etwas das man und das einen gefunden hat. Das mit einem klingt bzw. in einem aspektuell auf eine oder verschiedene Weisen anklingt. Das man ernsthaft und mit gleichzeitigem AbsurditĂ€tsbewusstsein betreibt – ohne „SeriösitĂ€t“ des sich selbst außerhalb der AbsurditĂ€t stellens.

Subjectivism and life

I can tell, seen before
I know the way, I know the law
Can’t believe, can’t obey
Can’t agree with all the things
I hear you say [Kosinsky: „And I can’t agree with all the things I say my“self“.]

Don’t ya know, all the time
You got yours an‘ ya know that
I got mine
Grab a hold, don’t let go
Don’t let them rob ya of the only way ya know
Oh no, no-one else, got the
right to make you sorry for yourself.
Stay clean […]

In the end, you’re on your own
And there is no one that can stop you being alone.

Lyrics of: Motörhead – stay clean