Archive for Januar, 2017

31. Januar 2017

Eine philosophisch-literarische Betrachtung-Interpretation (nicht z.B. eine evolutionsbiologische oder evolutionssoziologische und -psychologische): Wir können weder die Gleichheit der Singularitäten noch die Gleichheit von ‚Allem’* (allein) ertragen. Daher teilen wir die Welt in Gruppen ein und hierarchisieren nach Gruppen und zugeordneten Merkmalen und Wertungen.

___
* Unserer Re-Konstruktion, Zusammenfassung und Projektion von „Allem“ und einem möglichen existierenden „Alles“–als (z.B. energetisch) abgeschlossenes oder (z.B. durch Chaos oder Emergenz) offenes ‚Ganzes‘. Fassbar wäre ‚das Ganze‘ nur reduktiv-abstrakt, aber das spricht weder für noch gegen ein ‚Ganzes‘.

31. Januar 2017

The existence of desire not relative to a closed structure

Deleuzian (and Guattarian?) desire I interprete for example as:

Wanting/Desire that is not relative to the/a closed structure but wanting that is wanting itself (existing for itself) and that sounds and resounds with potentials, bringing them into actualised existence–in literature, art, inter-subjective projects, etc.

31. Januar 2017

Ich bin der bessere Betrachter der Dinge außerhalb von mir! Ich habe die bessere Subjektivität! Ich löse das Unlösbare besser als Du!

Politik ist was man bearbeitet in dem Wissen (einer höchstwahrscheinlichen Ahnung)*, dass es keine Lösung hat. Es ist daher im eigentlichen Sinne kein Problem, sondern ein Muster.

Wer nicht politisch ist, ist daher rational. Aber er findet seine irrationalen Energien in anderen Bereichen wieder.

___
* Implizites oder explizites Wissen. Es ist den Subjekten unterschiedlich bewusst, oder es zeigt sich ‚unbewusst‘ in indirekten Formen. In Momenten ist sie uns vermutlich allen begegnet: Die Ambivalenz der Existenz, an sich oder für uns als Menschen in unserer abstrakt-allgemeinen Interpretation und unseren subjektiven Erfahrungen.

31. Januar 2017

The projections of our minds can meet in different ways or not meet.
For the subject, these projections are never ‚one‘, not ‚within‘ the subject/for consciousness and not in the ‚outer‘ world.
They always have traces and shadows but are never the same.

31. Januar 2017

You cannot be „right“/on solild-solid ground about life. Whether life exists as such (ontologically)–as a closed whole or an open (in changing forms) whole. Or, which is to me currently as plausible/probable/potential etc., it only exists secondarily. For example as the various subjective interpretive projections and summarisations of the subjective consciousnesses that deal with the singular existent things and phenomena of life. Or, it exists, also secondarily, as the sounding and resounding (‚the interpretation‘) of all singular/existing-as-such things and phenomena, with or without consciousness. As an orchestra, which could play this way or that way or any other potentially possible way – contingency – and sounds and resounds differently in all different constellations and to all different perceivers and interpreters.

30. Januar 2017

Art as portal or approach to other worlds, and still resounding in the technically separated parts of the world, in the „everyday world“, in the current narrations of life, in other structurally differentiated areas of life and in life as a re-constructed whole.

30. Januar 2017

It is. It is different. It is neither better nor worse. It is. It is different. Plurality is a given. Interpretation is subjective. Potential is parallel. Actualisation is in subjects and constellations and maybe also occurs/can maybe be given form in: more or less stable/unstable contexts and constructions, which reproduce in unpredictable way–can be similarly reproducing and/or emerging something different.

30. Januar 2017

We are circling around a nondefinite „self“ and a nondefinite „world“.
As we take on different constellations/compositions and all things are maybe spiraling in ‚poststructural‘ notexact reproduction, for example the Derridean iteration.

29. Januar 2017

Energy amplitudes, intensities, fluctuations and patternisations (pattern-serialisations)

Energy is neither „naturally meant“ to be in some kind of equilibrium nor in some kind of nonequilibrium.

The energy balance of different levels (like societal abstract groupings and structurations, between and within concrete social groups, between and within subjects/human beings)
is distributed differently
– on the different levels/arenas of life (between–abstractly analytically separated–for example: biological and social arenas like sexuality and different social levels).
– on the different subjects, and their different ‚roles‘ etc.

Plurality of things is always potentially existent (and exists as an [at least to human beings] open [not fixable by human secure knowledge or fixation] potential). And this plurality of possibilities gets actualised in different basic moments, and secondary situations and serialisations.

28. Januar 2017

We, at least currently, can’t escape ‚Gravity‘.
Gravity though may escape us. As it is, in our realm of experience, weaker than the other three „fundamental forces“, it may hide somewhere. Anti-Gravity may also hide somewhere. And everything adds up to Zero and/or is unequally distributed in different locations, as for example different layers or dimensions.

Der kleine Mann im Kopf

Was wir sind | Was wir sein wollen | Was wir tun

Die Kieker (Die Spoekenkiekerei )

Blick in die Zukunft des politisch-medialen Komplexes

meermoabit

Moabiter Seefahrten

catveldmaus

Ölmalerei, Acrylmalerei und Fotografie.

systemagazin

Online-Journal für systemische Entwicklungen