S. K. asked (generally, not me personally) [paraphrased]: Reason is a random event, isn’t it?

Ontologically I would currently rather guess/interprete: Yes. ‚Randomness‘ though is also an interpretation and definition.
I currently imagine ‚Existence‘ (as a ‚whole’/an ‚all‘, or nonwhole/not a „one“/closed/synchronous etc. unity) as a picture (and/or pictures) of fractals and parallelism. So I guess that at the same time as randomness is interpreted <–> the will to reasons is also strong in human beings. Wherever this will (, need, longing, urge, pattern, etc.) may come from. For example one can construct a holistically-evolutionary re-narration. But every „whole“/(pragmatically as-if-) all-encompassing re-construction/“explanation“ seems particularist to me. And there is (or can be interpreted) always something else–a kind of openness of our thinking and maybe of ‚Existence‘ „as such“.


Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:


Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s