Stoa is „too“ levelled, Atomism is „too“ plural. Ideological battles are inavoidable. But they are not ‚all‘. The pluralist proposes and tries to: Tell also other stories, letting sound and resound different aspects and actualising different potentials parallel to other things (like the energies of/in ordering of ‚the world‘ -> subjective world view stabilisation and abstract-group ideology delineation).
Potential(s) as singular and as secondary/indirect resounding/serialised (between subjects and between ‚changing’/sequential moments/constellations) projects and the space between ideologies and world views that are tent pegs to keep a space between them open. Meta-structurally, spirally changing-reproducing, and singularily-momentarily as constellations we can experience.


Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Verbinde mit %s