In the intensity or (statement-„self“-)consciousness of my words, sentences, fragments and statements, I’m ‚currently‘ in moments Segoe UI Light and in moments Segoe UI Semibold.
Parallelism: We have no interpenetration, we have interpretation. It’s precious if you’re resounding with it — in one or more of your singular aspects that your consciousness is re-constructing as your subjectness, out of the singular things you perceive in some way before-conscious interpretation.
An individual* said: I make my art in, towards, for and against existence, or I try to check and balance powers and energies.
The first is singulary and possibly meeting other singularities.
The second is (the and a) subjective perspective and stance
on combinations of subjective angles, situations and larger narrative constructions based on the meetings of singularities in the social realm.
The social realm as maybe an indirect level where takes ‚place‘: the non-wholly meeting of subjective consciousnesses in moments and situations. And the inter-subjectively (and multiphrenely) communicated non-basic (less basic than the singularity of compositions of individual things) narratives. Narratives are/as more or less ontologically deep and epistemologically: subjectively intensely received/more or less strongly resembling and resounding in the different subjects (summarised for example as ‚characters‘).
* An individual person who in this story is an individually composed subjective consciousness-in-moments and a pluralistic & non-wholly reconstruction of sequences of moments/narrative combination of different ‚past moments‘.